Bid evaluation
Compare scope before price decides.
Tenderhub compares more than numbers. It includes descriptions, exclusions, alternatives, payment terms and whether each bid covers the same scope.
Why this workflow matters
Similar prices can represent different scope
One bid includes supply and installation; another covers supply only. Lump sums replace line items and incidental work is qualified in fine print. Without structured scope review, the comparison creates false precision.
Workflow
A comparison with commercial and technical context
- 01
Set the baseline
A BoQ, scope description or approved bid becomes the reference for all incoming offers.
- 02
Normalise scope
Descriptions, units and items are aligned without losing the original source.
- 03
Read the conditions
Exclusions, alternatives, reservations, deadlines and price validity are included in the comparison.
- 04
Document the decision
The award decision gains an auditable basis, including open points and clarifications.
Comparison dimensions
- Price and included scope
- Exclusions and bidder assumptions
- Alternatives and supplementary offers
- Lead times, validity and open clarifications
No automated award decision
Tenderhub structures the evidence. Evaluation, negotiation and award remain with the project and procurement team.
Related workflows
Turn incoming bids into one decision framework.
We demonstrate the comparison using your typical bid formats and the criteria your procurement team actually applies.
Start an analysis